MorphVOX Pro is a voice changer application with sound effects. Alien, they are pretty good as long as they remain close to your real voice, and the far-out. Good morning everyone! I'd like to know what is the best way one's singer's male voice sounds like a woman's (reaper compatible plugin if possible) on the market. So far I'm using Steinberg voice designer with those settings: The result is impressive, but I would like it cleaner. I've tried reducing the unwanted frequencies, using the plugin 'js filters band pass', and I feel I'm close to an acceptable result, provided I use two voices on one another with some reverb on it. My goal isn't to totally hide that I'm modifying the sound track, but just to get something clean enough to get a funny pleasant effect. Warhammer nahash pdf torrent download. Thank you very much in advance. The best way (well. The 2nd best way ) is probably for the singer to mimic a female voice and it may help if he can mimic a particular female so you don't get that silly falsetto thing that guys do. Maybe a combination of mimicry, with some EQ to cut-down any lower tones that 'leak through' and to bring-up the 'T' & 'S' sounds that females tend to emphasize more than males. And, then pitch-shifting if he can't hit the notes. There are not many males that can sing soprano (or females that can sing bass), but there are lots of males who cam mimic the timbre of a female voice and IMO it's a lot more about timbre than pitch. ![]() And, there are males that naturally sing like females. For a long time, I thought Neil Sedaka was a woman. Frankie Valli and The Bee Gees also come to mind. Part of the problem is that the female vocal tract is shorter than the male one (hence the higher freqs in general). This then means the formant structure is different as well, and, strangley, women use their vocal tracts slightly differently to men as well, just to add to the complication. So, in the end it's not just a matter of raising the fundamental frequency, the formant structure needs to be altered as well, which the better tools will probably try to do. Not trying to be a 'downer', just adding in some facts so you can then be aware of why sometimes the result is not so good. ![]() Isn't there software yet where you can take a sample of someone speaking and then type text in and have 'them' 'speak'? Does only the CIA have this right now or something? That would be fun to play with. Many years ago I was working on speech synthesis (YorkTalk), which used the same engine as MITtalk, Klattalk, DECTalk (and variants), originally dveloped by Dennis Klatt. The front end was written in Prolog by the Linguistics/Phonology folk, and I did a graphical interface into the generated 'code', in order to 'fix' and 'understand' things when they were not 'quite right'. In the end we could produce speech which on statistical testing showed that people could not tell it from the real thing - unlike many pure synthesis systems (ie NO samples at all). The next stage was to do voice modelling, which we could do given a sample of the person's speech - didn't take it too far as this was not the prime aim of the research - so, it was confined to 'vowel-y' sounds - so we could accurately get the system to say 'I owe you a yoyo Roy', given that sentence from the person.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |